OpenReview PVaFEuNnsD
| Claim | Verdict | Headline |
|---|---|---|
| 1 trainable exponents, two-timescale | reproduced | 0.61% vs 25.0% with exponents frozen (41×) |
| 2 270° wedge recovers μ = 2/3 | reproduced | 6.2e−5% error vs paper's 0.009% |
| 3 40-config wedge benchmark | reproduced | 100% / 0.008% vs naive 70% / 1.10% (135×) |
| 4 Theorem 4.5 error scaling | falsified | Δ⁻² holds (−1.928); √N fails (slope 0.0000) |
| 5 14.6% → 0.009% improvement | falsified | naive is 0.60%, not 14.6% |
| 6 Rayleigh limit Δ ≥ 0.1 | falsified | 10/10 at Δ=0.05; oracle resolves Δ=0.02 |